home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT1076>
- <link 93TG0179>
- <link 90TT2206>
- <link 90TT0248>
- <link 89TT0379>
- <title>
- May 20, 1991: A Blow To The N.R.A.
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- May 20, 1991 Five Who Could Be Vice President
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 26
- A Blow to The N.R.A.
- </hdr><body>
- <p>The House takes an overdue stand for gun control
- </p>
- <p>By ALEX PRUD'HOMME--Reported by Jonathan Beaty/Los Angeles and
- Hays Gorey/Washington
- </p>
- <p> Like rival gunfighters, the National Rifle Association
- and Handgun Control Inc. stalked each other for months. The
- contest hardly seemed equal: with 2.7 million members and an
- annual budget of $86 million, the giant N.R.A. seemed to tower
- over the bantamweight gun-control group, which has only 1
- million members and a $6.5 million budget. But after the smoke
- cleared from last week's shootout on Capitol Hill, advocates of
- gun control had triumphed in a surprisingly lopsided 239-186
- House vote for the so-called Brady bill.
- </p>
- <p> Named after James S. Brady, the former White House press
- secretary who was crippled in the attempted assassination of
- President Reagan in 1981, the bill calls for a seven-day waiting
- period for the purchase of handguns. The proposal is designed
- to give police time to check a purchaser's criminal and
- mental-health records (although it does not require such
- checks); furthermore, say advocates, the wait will provide a
- "cooling-off" period for hot-headed customers.
- </p>
- <p> Before voting on Brady, the House rejected an
- N.R.A.-backed counterproposal: a national computerized data bank
- allowing for immediate checks on a gun buyer's record. Critics
- claimed it would take years and cost hundreds of millions of
- dollars to set up such a computer network and charged that the
- plan was really designed to scuttle the Brady bill. "The
- stranglehold of the N.R.A. on Congress is now broken," crowed
- Representative Charles E. Schumer, a New York Democrat and a
- co-sponsor of the waiting-period bill. "They had this aura of
- invincibility...and they were beaten."
- </p>
- <p> It was a very different story in 1988, when a similar
- Brady proposal was roundly defeated in the House. But as crime
- statistics continued to soar, Brady and his wife Sarah--both
- conservative Republicans--kept up their single-minded fight.
- By last March, a Gallup poll showed that 87% of Americans
- favored a seven-day waiting period. During the same month, the
- Brady bill gained political momentum when Reagan, an N.R.A.
- lifetime member, endorsed it.
- </p>
- <p> But the battle is far from over, and progun forces still
- stand a good chance of success in the Senate. Reason: since the
- gun-control debate is largely defined by geographical rather
- than party affiliations--the fear of inner-city crime being
- countered by the rural affinity for firearms--the
- preponderantly rural Senate may well vote against Brady. Both
- Senate majority leader George Mitchell of Maine and Republican
- leader Bob Dole of Kansas, oppose the Brady bill, partly because
- they hail from rural states. Lifetime N.R.A. member President
- Bush does not support the gun-control plan either, but has
- vaguely suggested that he would not veto it if it were
- incorporated into his omnibus anticrime package.
- </p>
- <p> Whether or not the Brady bill ultimately succeeds, the
- momentum built by the measure has helped put the N.R.A. on the
- defensive. Long considered one of the country's most powerful
- lobbies, the progun group has been facing a steady decline in
- membership and revenue over the past few years. A bruising
- internal battle, in which hard-liner Wayne LaPierre last month
- replaced moderate J. Warren Cassidy as executive vice president,
- has left the N.R.A. with what some describe as a "siege
- mentality."
- </p>
- <p> In response to the Brady bill, LaPierre has spearheaded a
- blitzkrieg of mailings, phone calls and advertisements designed
- to inflame N.R.A. members and intimidate foes. On the day of the
- House vote, the organization poured its money into full-page ads
- in the Washington Post, while the airwaves were flooded with
- anti-Brady spots. "The N.R.A. really overplayed their hand with
- the massive advertising campaign," said Representative F. James
- Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican. It "became a vote on
- whether you support the N.R.A. or not." It remains to be seen
- whether the gun lobby will make good on its threat to defeat
- opponents in future election campaigns, as it has effectively
- done in the past.
- </p>
- <p> The Brady bill, which does not require identity checks and
- will not remove guns that are already in the hands of
- criminals, is a very limited piece of legislation. Said House
- Speaker Thomas S. Foley, a Washington State Democrat who did not
- vote on the gun-control issue last week: "I think all
- handgun-violence controls overpromise their results, without
- exception." But Brady's approval by the House represents a
- significant symbolic victory for the gun-control forces and
- shows that legislators are responding to the public's concerns
- about crime. Says Houston homicide division Captain Bill Edison,
- one of the many top police officials around the country who
- favor Brady: "I can't sit out here amongst the carnage I see on
- the streets and not support a waiting bill. A waiting period
- will save x number of lives. How many, we could argue about
- forever."
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-